Security Ops News

[P] [<] [N] [>] | Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

> Post #47157224 by tintinnabula | 268 points | 99 comments | 4h ago
Jimi Hendrix was a systems engineer
(No body text)
> Post #47159302 by shrikaranhanda | 55 points | 12 comments | 1h ago
First Website
(No body text)
> Post #47157398 by thellimist | 109 points | 53 comments | 4h ago
Making MCP cheaper via CLI
(No body text)
> Post #47153798 by surprisetalk | 290 points | 451 comments | 8h ago
Bus stop balancing is fast, cheap, and effective
(No body text)
> Post #47154399 by andreynering | 167 points | 308 comments | 7h ago
Windows 11 Notepad to support Markdown
(No body text)
> Post #47159364 by SeenNotHeard | 18 points | 17 comments | 1h ago
Origin of the rule that swap size should be 2x of the physical memory
(No body text)
> Post #47154971 by tosh | 226 points | 47 comments | 7h ago
The Om Programming Language
(No body text)
> Post #47151842 by vintagedave | 83 points | 109 comments | 10h ago
Show HN: Respectify – A comment moderator that teaches people to argue better
My partner, Nick Hodges, and I, David Millington, have been on the Internet for a very long time -- since the Usenet days. We’ve seen it all, and have long been frustrated by bad comments, horrible people, and discouraging discussions. We've also been around places where the discussion is wonderful and productive. How to get more of the latter and less of the former?

Current moderation tools just seem to focus on deletion and banning. Wouldn’t it be helpful to encourage productive discussion and teach people how to discuss and argue (in the debate sense) better?

A year ago we started building Respectify to help foster healthy communication. Instead of just deleting bad-faith comments, we suggest better, good-faith ways to say what folks are trying to say. We help people avoid: * Logical fallacies (false dichotomy, strawmen, etc.) * Tone issues (how others will read the comment) * Relevance to the actual page/post topic * Low-effort posts * Dog whistles and coded language

The commenter gets an explanation of what's wrong and a chance to edit and resubmit. It's moderation + education in one step. We want, too, to automate the entire process so the site owner can focus on content and not worry about moderation at all. And over time, comment by comment, quietly coach better thinking.

Our main website has an interactive demo: https://respectify.ai. As the demo shows, the system is completely tunable and adjustable, from "most anything goes" to "You need to be college debate level to get by me".

We hope the result is better discussions and a better Internet. Not too much to ask, eh?

We love the kind of feedback this group is famous for and hope you will supply some!

> Post #47139716 by DalasNoin | 185 points | 157 comments | 1d ago
Large-Scale Online Deanonymization with LLMs
Pdf: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.16800 (via https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16800)
> Post #47141107 by schopra909 | 67 points | 11 comments | 1d ago
Learnings from 4 months of Image-Video VAE experiments
(No body text)
[P] [<] [N] [>] | Pages: 1 2 3 4 5